Nobody:
Me and the boys deploying in Iran to fight in World War 3: pic.twitter.com/aigJCUK4C4 — ☘️ℤ𝕒𝕔𝕙☘️ (@RZekek) January 3, 2020
Kata Twitter Soal Manipulasi Trending Twitter
- World War 3 tiba-tiba menempati posisi 3 trending topic di Twitter wilayah Indonesia dan WWIII ada di posisi kesembilan. Untuk wilayah dunia, Iran dan World War 3 menempati ranking pertama dan kedua. Ada apa gerangan?Rupanya, melesatnya topik dengan jutaan tweet sudah diposting itu adalah imbas pembunuhan Komandan Garda Revolusi Iran, Mayor Jenderal Qasem Soleimani, dalam serangan di Bandara Baghdad, Irak. Serangan lewat drone dilakukan militer Amerika Serikat atas perintah Presiden AS Donald Trump.Garda Revolusi Iran mengonfirmasi kematian Soleimani. Serangan udara itu juga dilaporkan menewaskan Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis yang menjabat wakil komandan Hashed al-Shaabi atau Pasukan Mobilisasi Populer (PMF) -- milisi pro-Iran di Irak.Disebutkan Pentagon, Soleimani mengatur serangan terhadap pangkalan koalisi di Irak, termasuk 27 Desember 2018 saat serangan roket menewaskan seorang kontraktor sipil AS. "Soleimani juga menyetujui serangan terhadap Kedubes AS di Baghdad pekan ini," ujar Pentagon.Tak heran jika hal itu menjadi topik sangat panas di dunia maya. Cukup banyak yang mencemaskan akan meletus perang skala besar atau bahkan perang dunia akibat peristiwa ini."AS baru membunuh seseorang yang setara wakil presiden Iran. Sulit melihat hal ini tidak akan memuncak menjadi perang. Tak heran Perang Dunia 3 trending," tulis seorang warganet."Saya ingat Barack Obama menjaga perdamaian dengan Iran dan mencegah Perang Dunia 3. Sekarang Donald Trump mencoba memulai Perang Dunia 3 sehingga ia tetap bisa jadi Presiden," tulis yang lain."Mayoritas warga AS ingin perawatan kesehatan lebih baik, gaji lebih tinggi, tidak ada perang. Trump malah mulai perang," protes yang lain."Tweet Perang Dunia III berlebihan karena saya tidak yakin Iran adalah ancaman militer buat AS," sebut komentar berikutnya."Iran tidak berada dalam posisi untuk merespons secara militer. Jangan takut, Perang Dunia III takkan terjadi,"Banyak juga netizen yang menanggapi kabar tersebut dengan nada bercanda. Banyak meme bertebaran dengan topik tersebut.
Indeks Harga Saham gabungan (IHSG) mengawali perdagangan terakhir di pekan ini, Jumat (3/1/2020), di zona hijau.Pada pembukaan perdagangan, IHSG menguat 0,36% ke level 6.306,19. Pada penutupan perdagangan, apresiasi indeks saham acuan di Indonesia tersebut telah bertambah lebar menjadi 0,64% ke level 6.323,47.Dengan apresiasi pada hari ini, maka IHSG resmi memutus rantai pelemahan yang sudah terjadi selama dua hari beruntun.Walaupun IHSG menguat, patut dicatat bahwa perdagangan di pasar saham tanah air pada hari ini berlangsung dengan sangat sepi. Melansir data RTI, volume transaksi pada hari ini hanyalah sebanyak 8,04 miliar unit saham.Padahal menurut data dari Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI), rata-rata volume transaksi harian di sepanjang tahun 2019 mencapai 14,54 miliar unit saham.Secara nilainya, jumlah dana yang berputar di pasar saham Indonesia pada hari ini hanyalah Rp 5,74 triliun, jauh di bawah rata-rata nilai transaksi harian di sepanjang tahun 2019 yang mencapai Rp 9,11 triliun.Saham-saham yang berkontribusi signifikan dalam mendongkrak kinerja IHSG pada hari ini di antaranya: PT Bank Central Asia Tbk/BBCA (+1,64%), PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk/TLKM (+1,79%), PT HM Sampoerna Tbk/HMSP (+2,39%), PT Charoen Pokphand Indonesia Tbk/CPIN (+4,94%), dan PT Astra International Tbk/ASII (+1,09%).Kinerja IHSG pada hari ini berbanding terbalik dengan mayoritas bursa saham utama kawasan Asia yang justru bergerak di zona merah: indeks Shanghai turun 0,05%, indeks Hang Seng melemah 0,32%, dan indeks Straits Times terkoreksi 0,5%. Untuk diketahui, perdagangan di bursa saham Jepang diliburkan pada hari ini.Bursa saham Benua Kuning melemah selepas pasar saham AS alias Wall Street mencetak rekor pada perdagangan kemarin, Kamis (2/1/2019). Pada penutupan perdagangan kemarin, indeks Dow Jones naik 1,16%, indeks S&P 500 menguat 0,84%, dan indeks Nasdaq Composite terapresiasi 1,33%. Ketiga indeks saham acuan di AS tersebut ditutup di level tertinggi sepanjang masa.Wall Street masih menunjukkan performa yang kuat pasca sudah meroket di tahun 2019. Di sepanjang tahun lalu, indeks Dow Jones naik 22,3%, indeks S&P 500 menguat 28,9%, dan indeks Nasdaq Composite terapresiasi lebih dari 35%.Tingginya ekspektasi bahwa AS dan China akan segera meneken kesepakatan dagang tahap satu menjadi faktor yang memantik aksi beli di bursa saham AS. Menjelang tahun baru kemarin, Presiden AS Donald Trump mengungkapkan bahwa kesepakatan dagang tahap satu dengan China akan diteken di Gedung Putih pada tanggal 15 Januari.Hal tersebut diumumkan oleh Trump melalui akun Twitter pribadinya, @realDonaldTrump. Menurut Trump, pejabat tingkat tinggi dari China akan menghadiri penandatanganan kesepakatan dagang tahap satu. Kemudian, Trump juga mengungkapkan bahwa nantinya dirinya akan bertandang ke Beijing guna memulai negosiasi terkait kesepakatan dagang tahap dua.
Seperti yang diketahui, sebelumnya AS dan China mengumumkan bahwa mereka telah berhasil mencapai kesepakatan dagang tahap satu. Dengan adanya kesepakatan dagang tahap satu tersebut, Trump membatalkan rencana untuk mengenakan bea masuk tambahan terhadap produk impor asal China pada tanggal 15 Desember. Untuk diketahui, nilai produk impor asal China yang akan terdampak oleh kebijakan ini sejatinya mencapai US$ 160 miliar.Tak sampai di situ, Trump mengatakan bahwa bea masuk sebesar 15% terhadap produk impor asal China senilai US$ 120 miliar nantinya akan dipangkas menjadi 7,5% saja sebagai bagian dari kesepakatan dagang tahap satu. Di sisi lain, China membatalkan rencana untuk mengenakan bea masuk balasan yang disiapkan guna membalas bea masuk dari AS pada tanggal 15 Desember.Masih sebagai bagian dari kesepakatan dagang tahap satu, China akan meningkatkan pembelian produk agrikultur asal AS secara signifikan. Trump menyebut bahwa China akan segera memulai pembelian produk agrikultur asal AS yang jika ditotal akan mencapai US$ 50 miliar.Lebih lanjut, kesepakatan dagang tahap satu AS-China juga mengatur mengenai komplain dari AS terkait pencurian hak kekayaan intelektual dan transfer teknologi secara paksa yang sering dialami oleh perusahaan-perusahaan asal Negeri Paman Sam.Jika kesepakatan dagang tahap satu benar diteken nantinya, laju perekonomian AS dan China di tahun-tahun mendatang bisa terus dipertahankan di level yang relatif tinggi.Mengingat posisi AS dan China sebagai dua negara dengan nilai perekonomian terbesar di planet bumi, tentu prospek ditekennya kesepakatan dagang yang semakin nyata menjadi kabar yang baik bagi perekonomian dunia.
Mendadak kata kunci Wold War 3 trending topic Twitter pada Jumat 3/12/2020).
Tak diketahui pasti apa yang menyebabkan hal tersebut.
Namun ada dugaan munculnya kata World War 3 kemungkinan terkait serangan militer AS di Bandara Baghdaf, Irak.
Serangan rudal itu menewaskan jenderal top yang merupakan komandan pasukan Quds.
Merunut sejarahnya, perang dunia (world war) I dan II memang mengerikan.
Perang tersebut melibatkan beberapa negara terutama di Eropa.
Perang dunia I melibatkan blok sekutu dan blok sentral.
The US airstrike ordered by Donald Trump killed Iran general Qasam Soleimani outside Baghdad airport in Iraq (Picture: Reuters/AFP)
The phrase ‘World War 3’ began trending after the killing of the Iranian leader’s second in command in a US airstrike.
Iranian general Qasem Soleimani was killed in a bombing ordered by President Donald Trump overnight at Baghdad Airport.
After news of his death broke, the country’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei sparked fears of war after he promised ‘harsh vengeance’.
Many of those tweeting about the airstrike used memes to bring light to the situation, joking about fears it could spark ‘World War 3’ – a phrase now trending on Twitter.
Searches for ‘World War 3’ also spiked on Google within hours of the airstrike in Iraq overnight.
Google Trends recorded ‘Iran’ as the second most searched term in the United States, with more than 500,000 searches for the topic.
My dad telling me to be brave and make the family proud after getting deployed for World War 3 pic.twitter.com/6U7W53jBqy — Kadet † (@snillo_) January 3, 2020
Advertisement
Advertisement
Though much of the comments online mock hysteria surrounding a ‘world war’, there are real fears of repercussions following Soleimani’s death.
In a tweet, Iran’s leader Ayatollah Khomeinei said the ‘criminals’ responsible had ‘his [Soleimani] and other martyrs’ blood on their evil hands’.
He added: ‘God willing, his work and his path will not be stopped.’
The dramatic attack came months of tensions between the US and Iran in which Tehran shot down an American military surveillance drone and seized oil tankers.
This week, Mr Trump blamed Iran for a protest in Iraq which saw demonstrators break into the US embassy in Baghdad and torch the place.
A destroyed vehicle on fire following a US strike on Baghdad Airport road in which top Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani was killed (Picture: AFP)
Soleimani was Iran’s second most powerful man (Picture: AP)
Pictures of the embassy’s burned out wreck later emerged, with Mr Trump declaring Iran ‘will pay a very big price’.
Advertisement
Advertisement
The US also blames the country for a series of attacks targeting tankers, as well as a September assault on Saudi Arabia’s oil industry that temporarily halved its production.
The tensions take root in Mr Trump’s decision in May 2018 to withdraw the US from Iran’s nuclear deal with world powers, struck under his predecessor, Barack Obama.
Soleimani was the target of Friday’s US attack, which was conducted by an armed American drone, according to a US official.
His vehicle was struck on an access road near the Baghdad airport, killing him and eight others.
Donald Trump had blamed Iran for a demonstration at the US embassy in Iraq this week (Picture: Reuters)
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
A senior Iraqi security official said the airstrike took place near the cargo area after Soleimani left his plane to be greeted by al-Muhandis and others.
Advertisement
The official said the plane had arrived from either Lebanon or Syria.
The US president was holidaying on his estate in Palm Beach, Florida, at the time of the strike, but sent out a tweet of an American flag.
Got a story for Metro.co.uk? Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk. For more stories like this, check our news page.
A famous quote from Albert Einstein says, “I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones,” dating back to the 1940s when the first nuclear weapons were being developed. Although the famed physicist didn’t actually develop the atomic bomb, he was well aware of how nuclear weapons could affect the world.
The President of the United States, Donald Trump’s vow to hit Iran and make it ‘pay a very big price’ comes after the fiasco of the attack on 6,000 demonstrators at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. In an equally brutal retaliation, Trump ordered an airstrike that killed top Iranian general Qassim Suleimani in Baghdad. If not anything, the counter-strike is an unveiled threat to unleash America’s most potent weapons of mass destruction onto the Middle Eastern country and has erupted scares of World War III across the globe.
SEE ALSO: US Airstrike Kills Top Iranian Commander, Twitter Reacts With World War 3 Jokes
Considering how close Iran is to developing its own weapon of mass destruction, it won’t even take an educated guess to predict that the next World War, if it does happen between these two countries, will be fought with nuclear weapons. Reportedly, most U.S. weapons are 10 to 50 times stronger than the bombs that brought Hiroshima to a standstill. So, you can just imagine how such a strategic nuclear war would impact the Earth, posing an existential threat to humanity regardless of the scale of its severity.
Take, for example, a relatively new research that models the indirect effects of nuclear detonations on the environment and climate in case of a limited regional nuclear war between India and Pakistan. The combines arsenals of both the nations equal to more than 220 nuclear warheads. Such an event will cause fires to ignite over a large area which would inject large volumes of soot and debris into the stratosphere. This would thus block out the sun and cause a significant drop in average surface temperature and precipitation across the globe, with effects that could last for more than a decade.
SEE ALSO: Researchers Say A Nuclear War Between India And Pakistan Might Kill 125 Million People
According to this particularly convincing report, a bomb can now be manufactured which will be 2,500 times as powerful as the one that destroyed Hiroshima. Such a bomb, if exploded near the ground or under water, could send radioactive particles into the upper air. They would sink gradually and reach the surface of the earth in the form of deadly dust or rain. It was this dust which infected the Japanese fishermen and their catch of fish. No one knows how widely such lethal radioactive particles might be diffused, but the best authorities are unanimous in saying that a war with H-bombs might possibly put an end to the human race.
The culture of war mongering that’s especially endorsed by major world leaders like Trump off late is scary. One just cannot overlook their attitude on the idea of a nuclear war as a dramatic rhetoric of global humanitarian disaster because this a more plausible scenario now than ever, given the time we stand in. Nuclear war is also a war on the environment and its indirect repercussions are to be borne by the generations to come and also the geological space around us. It’s about time authorities realize the gravity of the situation and put our planet before any international conflict.
SEE ALSO: Climate Change Models Have Been Kicking Ass Since The 1970s
During the Sixties, the world came close to all-out nuclear war as the US and Soviet Union tussled over ultimate supremacy both on the ground and in space. These tensions reached their peak in October 1962 during the Cuban Missile Crisis, after Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev agreed to fulfil Fidel Castro’s request to place nuclear missiles in Cuba. Leading up to the incident, both the US and the USSR continued to develop their nuclear weapons, becoming locked in a dangerous arms race, to create the ultimate weapon of mass destruction.
A letter from Harold Macmillan to John F. Kennedy reveals the former Prime Minister’s worries over the escalation. Dated August 3, 1962, it reads: “Dear my friend, I am increasingly concerned about the immense diffusion of so-called tactical nuclear weapons in NATO Europe. “According to my information there are now many thousands of these weapons, and their total capacity amounts to scores of megatons. “If they were used in action, the scale of destruction would be comparable to that from a strategic strike.
Harold Macmillan sent hte letter to John F Kennedy
The Soviet Union fulfilled Fidel Castro's request
We must demonstrate our will to use strategic nuclear strength harold Macmillan
“The idea that the armies in Europe could fight a tactical battle with nuclear weapons of this destructive power seems to me to be wholly unrealistic. “Conditions in the battle area would be such that anything like a war of movement would be virtually impracticable.” Mr Macmillan then went on to make a chilling suggestion. He added: “Moreover, once these weapons were engaged on this scale, escalation would almost inevitably follow and the strategic strength on either side would begin to be deployed. “I believe that we must take a fresh look at this dangerous situation. JUST IN: President's claim US will ‘take initiative’ in nuclear war escalation revealed
Harold Macmillan was close with JFK
“It seems to me that there would be great advantage if we could work towards the concept of a tactical nuclear command directly under Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SAUCER). “It would mean that, instead of preparing to fight a tactical battle with nuclear weapons, we were aiming to make such discriminatory use of those weapons as might be necessary to demonstrate our will to use our strategic nuclear strength if fighting continued." Mr Macmillan then asked whether JFK could keep their conversations private. He continued: “I am convinced that on this point the current NATO strategy is misconceived and I believe that, in the months ahead, we shall try to get it modified along the general lines which I have indicated. DON'T MISS
World War 3: The single ‘greatest threat to democracy’ [REVEALED]
WW3 preparation: Where billionaires are building underground bunkers [PICTURES]
China left scrambling over Taiwan independence: 'We will go to war!' [EXPLAINED]
Location of Soviet ballistic missiles
The Cuban Missile Crisis lasted 13 days
“it would be helpful to me if I could have your thoughts on this and I should be greatly relieved if I could feel that we could move forward together, as soon as circumstances allow. “I have given you this frank indication on this problem – much as you did the other day in your message to me of July 27 on nuclear tests. “The delicacy of this question, especially with the Germans and French, makes it important that we should keep this matter between ourselves until we have jointly decided what course to pursue.” But, on October 16, tensions skyrocketed after Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev agreed to fulfil Fidel Castro’s request to place nuclear missiles on the Caribbean island of Cuba.
WW3 flashpoints
Trending
World War 3 fears surged after Iran threatened to strike back after US forces targeted and killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in a military strike on Iraqi soil on Thursday. The Pentagon released a statement claiming the attack and suggesting the second-most-powerful commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) was preparing launch hostilities against the US. House minority whip Steve Scalise praised US President Donald Trump for authorising the strike, warning Iran Washington is ready to unleash "lethal and overwhelming strength" to defend its citizens from terrorists.
Speaking to Fox News, Rep. Scalise said: "This has been building for a long time but President Trump took incredibly decisive action to take out the head of this major terrorist organisation. "The IRGC has been a major terrorist organisation, Soleimani himself responsible for the death of over 600 of our men and women in uniform. This man has been one of the most brutal terrorists in the world. "This is was an attack taking out one of the worst terrorists threatening the US." Mr Scalise continued: "The Pentagon has said this was a defensive action because they were seeing other things ready to happen and so it wasn’t just taking out somebody out for what happened at the embassy but also he was probably getting ready to direct other attacks against other Americans. He won’t be able to kill anybody else because he’s been taken out. JUST IN: World War 3 alert: Iran desperate for REVENGE after US airstrike
World War 3 fears reignited after the US killed Iran general Soleimani
Donald Trump accused Iran of orchestrating the two-day siege of the US Embassy in Baghdad
"President Trump has sent a strong message to Iran and to any other terrorist around the world – this is serious business." He added: "If you come after America, we’re going to come after you with lethal strength and overwhelming strength." The US and Iran have long been at odds since Iranians stormed the US Embassy in Tehran in 1979, sparking a siege which lasted over a year and came to be known as the Iran hostage crisis. The attack is believed to also have been in response to Monday's attack on the US Embassy in Baghdad which saw several members of staff forced to take refuge in the compound after a crowd of locals surrounded the building to protest America airstrikes against Shiite militia Ketaib Hezbollah. READ MORE: Iran war: Does Iran have nuclear weapons? Could it nuke the US?
The Pentagon said they attacked Soleimani over concerns of further strikes against the US
Scalise warned Tehran the US is ready to use "lethal and overwhelming strength" to defend its citizens
Iran has built up a large military arsenal through the years
Trending
North Korea leader Kim Jong Un has sparked alarm after he threatened to resume nuclear testing - could we be on the brink of World War Three? Kim announced he is ceasing the suspension of nuclear and long-range missile tests established during talks with the US. The dictator also said North Korea would be introducing "a new strategic weapon".
READ MORE Flights: Woman urged to throw drink over man after he does this Kim’s arsenal is now estimated to include up to 50 nuclear bombs and various delivery systems, including solid-fuel missiles designed to beat missile-defence systems and developmental ICBMs potentially capable of reaching the US mainland. The leader gave no clear indication that a resumption of such tests was imminent and appeared to leave the door open for eventual negotiations. However, if the worst does happen and WW3 does break out - where is the safest place to go? These are the UK’s nuclear bunkers built in the event of a disaster. READ MORE: Cruise: Liner collides with dock in Sicily
World War 3 :Kim announced he is ceasing the suspension of nuclear and long-range missile tests
World War 3: These are the UK’s nuclear bunkers built in the event of a disaster
Drakelow Tunnels These tunnels - found beneath the Kingsford Country Park north of Kidderminster, Worcestershire - were originally part of a factory for Second World War munitions. During the cold war, it served as a nuclear bunker and also housed a BBC studio. The site was sold in 1993 and a cannabis farm of 885 plants was found on the site in 2013. Barnton Quarry This historic bunker was built in the 1950s and was designed to fit around 400 politicians underground. It is found deep underground in Corstorphine Hill. According to Forces Network, the bunker served as Sector Operations Centre for co-coordinating RAF fighter jets and protected Scotland from attacks by Russian long-range nuclear bombers until around 1960. Central Government War Headquarters The 240-acre bunker is in an old underground Bath stone quarry known as Spring Quarry, in Corsham, Wiltshire. After the Cold War, it was taken over by the MoD. The site was put up for sale in October 2005, and proposed plans for it included a data store or the “biggest wine cellar in Europe.” DON'T MISS Flights: Man filmed urinating in airport terminal [PHOTO] Flights: Ryanair launches low-cost new year sale [DEAL] Flight attendant reveals the gifts she’s received from passengers [INSIDER]
RAF High Wycombe The RAF operations centre at High Wycombe has a nuclear bunker. According to Civil Defence Today, it cost approximately £83million to build. From this bunker, the warning message would have been issued to the United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation (UKWMO) and would be the trigger for today's National attack warning system. Anchor telephone exchange The Anchor telephone exchange in Birmingham is one of three built in the UK before World War II. The entrance could be found at the back of Telephone House, between Lionel Street and Fleet Street. Another entrance was on Newhall Street. Workers at the Anchor telephone exchange were not told they were working on a nuclear bunker during construction and could not tell their family about their work. The building has been closed down now due to asbestos but the Mess Room and Canteen are intact. Castleton Cold War Bunker This bunker in North Yorkshire, built in April 1959, was manned by Royal Observer Corps (ROC) personnel. They would monitor the skies and radiation levels and were ready to act to protect the local residents. Once damaged by vandals, the Castleton bunker has since been restored and is now a museum.
World War 3: The RAF operations centre at High Wycombe has a nuclear bunker
READ MORE WW3: President's claim US will ‘take initiative’ in nuclear war RNAD Coulport Royal Naval Armaments Depot Coulport, shortened to RNAD Coulport, on Loch Long in Argyll, sorts nuclear warheads for trident. Kelvedon Hatch Secret Nuclear Bunker This bunker in Essex was first built as an air defence station and became a bunker. Now it is open to the public as a tourist attraction and houses a museum dedicated to the Cold War. York Cold War Bunker This bunker, in Colgate, York, was built in 1961. It serves as the regional headquarters and control centre for the Royal Observer Corps's No. 20 Group. Now it is an English Heritage Scheduled Monument. Brackla Hiding underneath the ground of this housing estate in Bridgend Wales is a nuclear bunker developed in the 1960s. It was sold in 1996 and entry is denied. Wood Norton, Worcestershire This is a stately home in Evesham, Worcestershire. The Bredon Wing has a 175-foot bunker beneath it.
Trending
World War 3: York Cold War Bunker was built in 1961
His comments came in a Story magazine article dated November 1961, following the Berlin Crisis over the occupational status of the German capital. The incident started when the USSR launched an ultimatum demanding the withdrawal of all armed forces from Berlin, including the Western armed forces in West Berlin. The crisis culminated in the city's de facto partition with the East German erection of the Berlin Wall, but JFK was worried the Soviets would not stop there.
Assuming forces may try to push further into Europe, he wrote in a magazine article following the events: "Berlin developments may confront us with a situation where we may desire to take the initiative in the escalation of conflict from the local to the general war level.” His comments referred to Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which states: “The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all. “Consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.” However, they sparked fear worldwide after they were interpreted as plans to launch a nuclear attack on the USSR.
JFK sparked worry across the world
The Berlin Wall being erected in 1961
We may desire to take the initiative in the escalation of conflict John F. Kennedy
Documents seen by Express.co.uk reveal a worrying exchange between the UK Ambassador, David Ormsby-Gore, and the President in March 1962. Mr Ormsby-Gore asked via telegram: “Mr President, could you elaborate on the idea attributed to you in a magazine article that there may be circumstances under which we would have to take the initiative in a nuclear war?” To which Kennedy responded: “Yes, I think Mr (Jerome David) Salinger’s statement made it very clear that this was intended to be merely a restatement of a traditional position where if a vital area like Western Europe, was being overrun by conventional forces, that the US would take means available to defend it. "It was not intended to suggest, as Mr Salinger said, that this meant the United States would take aggressive action on its own part, or would launch an attack, a so-called preventive attack on its part. READ MORE: UK's chilling ‘execution’ plan for nuclear war anarchy exposed
Daid Ornsby-Gore besides JFK
“It is not our policy, nor the policy of previous administrations and the article read in context made it clear that if there was an attack of overwhelming proportions by conventional forces in an area such as Europe, we would meet our treaty commitments.” Thankfully, the President’s comments calmed tensions, for a few months at least. But, on October 16, they skyrocketed again after Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev agreed to fulfil Fidel Castro’s request to place nuclear missiles on the Caribbean island of Cuba. The discovery by the US-led to a 13-day confrontation, which is considered to be the closest the world has come to nuclear war. DON'T MISS
World War 3: The single ‘greatest threat to democracy’ [REVEALED]
WW3 preparation: Where billionaires are building underground bunkers [PICTURES]
China left scrambling over Taiwan independence: 'We will go to war!' [EXPLAINED]
Fidel Castro in the Sixties
JFK During the Cuban Missile Crisis
Trending
Key Point: The Warsaw Pact planned a decapitating nuclear strike across central Europe.
Last month in the National Interest we discussed NATO’s plan for World War III in Europe. The scenario, set in the late 1980s, assumed that the forces of the Soviet Union and the rest of the Warsaw Pact—namely East Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary—steamrollered West Germany to defeat NATO. The plan assumed the western alliance would defend as far forward as possible while avoiding the use of tactical nuclear weapons.
But what about the Warsaw Pact? After the Cold War ended, the Polish government made public classified Soviet documents that revealed the likely war plan. The plan, known as “Seven Days to the Rhine,” was the basis of 1979 military exercise that assumed NATO as the aggressor, having nuked a series of twenty-five targets in Poland, including Warsaw and the port of Gdansk. The cover story of countering aggression was a mere fig leaf for the true nature of the anticipated conflict: a bolt-from-the-blue Soviet attack against NATO.
By the 1980s NATO had shifted to a “Flexible Response” nuclear doctrine: the alliance was prepared to use nuclear weapons, but would seek to win the war conventionally. This is in stark contrast to the Warsaw Pact, which saw their use as inevitable and planned to use them from the outset. Such early would confer the pact an enormous strategic advantage over NATO.
In “Seven Days to the Rhine,” Soviet nuclear forces would destroy Hamburg, Dusseldorf, Cologne, Frankfurt, Stuttgart, Munich and the West German capital of Bonn. NATO headquarters in Brussels would be annihilated, as would the Belgian port of Antwerp. The Dutch capital and port of Amsterdam would also be destroyed. Denmark would suffer two nuclear strikes.
The result would be a headless NATO and the destruction or demoralization of civilian governments in West Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands and Denmark—precisely the countries likely to be occupied at the end of the seven days. The elimination of the port cities of Hamburg, Antwerp and Amsterdam would severely curtail NATO’s ability to flow reinforcements from the United Kingdom and North America.
Read the original article.
