Anonymous Op-Ed in The Times Causes a Stir Online and in the White House
There have only been a handful of previous cases in which The Times granted anonymity to an Op-Ed writer, but this piece “deserved an airing,” an editor said.
Several days ago a senior official in the Trump administration used an intermediary to contact New York Times op-ed page editor Jim Dao.
Through the go-between, the senior official expressed interest in writing an explosive piece for the paper, describing a "resistance" to President Trump within the government that works overtime to protect the United States from the president's worst impulses.
The result, published on the New York Times' website on Wednesday, prompted speculation all across Washington about who the official is.
Dao, of course, isn't saying. In a telephone interview, he was careful not to share any identifying details, even the person's gender.
"The person contacted me through an intermediary," he said.
Dao said it happened "several days ago," declining to be more specific.
Many officials within the administration can be considered "senior," even if they do not work in the West Wing or interact directly with Trump.
Dao declined to characterize just how "senior" the whistleblower is. He said the Times did speak to the author directly, but wouldn't say how so.
"We were simply trying to abide by the standard that the Times in general would use when referring to someone who's not named," he said.
Dao reports to editorial page editor James Bennet, who in turn reports to the Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger. The opinion section is separate from the newsroom.
Dao said there are only a "very small number of people within the Times who know this person's identity," but he declined to name them.
He said "we have taken a number of special precautions to protect the person's identity."
Face to face meetings? Encrypted messaging? The speculation will continue, but Dao would not go into any detail.
He said there was no special effort to disguise the person's writing style, for example by rewriting the piece in some fashion.
"There's editing in everything we do," he said, but it's based on making the person's views "clearer" and adhering to style standards.
Despite the extraordinary nature of the op-ed, Dao said, his initial response to the intermediary was the same as it would be for anyone else.
The op-ed came on the same week that the excerpts from Bob Woodward's book "Fear" have revived conversations about Trump's behavior and fitness for office.
Dao said that as far as he knows, "this is a coincidence," meaning the senior official's outreach was not related to the Woodward book.
Major newspapers almost never publish unnamed op-ed pieces. At The Times, it is very rare, but not quite unprecedented.
Dao said he had published a few other anonymous pieces during his tenure as op-ed editor, which began in early 2016. The most recent example was a piece in June by an unnamed asylum seeker from El Salvador.
In the case of the senior Trump administration official, The Times said it granted anonymity "at the request of the author" because the person's job "would be jeopardized by its disclosure."
Dao declined to say whether he pressed the person to speak on the record.
He said, "we felt it was a very strong piece written by someone who had something important to say and who's speaking from a place of their own sense of personal ethics and conscience. That was our main focus."
He said he couldn't talk about the fact-checking process in detail, but "we do make an effort to check the facts for all the pieces."
Dao did not rule out publishing another op-ed from the senior official in the future.
Washington (CNN) An unnamed senior Trump administration official assailed President Donald Trump's "amorality" and reckless decision-making in a New York Times op-ed published Wednesday and said he or she is part of a "resistance" working to thwart Trump's worst impulses.
"The dilemma -- which (Trump) does not fully grasp -- is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations," the Times piece reads. "I would know. I am one of them."
The Times said disclosing the name of the official, who is known to the publication, would jeopardize the official's job, and that publishing the piece anonymously was the only way to deliver an important perspective to readers. Major newspapers almost never publish unnamed op-ed pieces. At The New York Times, it is very rare, but not entirely unprecedented.
The op-ed came on the heels of reports based on a damning book about Trump's presidency by veteran journalist Bob Woodward and amplified the sense that top advisers to the President have serious concerns about his conduct in office and leadership abilities. And it is likely to compound Trump's sense of paranoia that he is surrounded by advisers who may be duplicitous and untrustworthy.
Trump quickly lashed out on Wednesday, dismissing the op-ed as "really a disgrace" and "gutless" and assailing the author and The New York Times for publishing the anonymous opinion piece.
"We have somebody in what I call the failing New York Times that's talking about he's part of the resistance inside the Trump administration," Trump said. "This is what we have to deal with. And you know the dishonest media ... But it's really a disgrace."
He then pivoted to his accomplishments, claiming that "nobody has done what this administration has done in terms of getting things passed and getting things through."
Trump later tweeted a pointed and unsubstantiated attack on the Times, questioning if the author of the op-ed exists. If the author does exist, the organization should publicly identify the individual, Trump said.
"Does the so-called 'Senior Administration Official' really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source?" Trump tweeted. "If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!"
Corroboration for Woodward's book
The op-ed offers a firsthand account that corroborates key themes of Woodward's book: that some of the President's top advisers have a dim view of the commander in chief and are quietly working to thwart Trump's most reckless and impulsive decisions from becoming a reality.
The author writes the resistance inside the Trump administration is not the same "resistance" of the left against the President and said they and like-minded colleagues working to thwart some of Trump's actions "want the administration to succeed ... But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic."
"That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump's more misguided impulses until he is out of office."
The result, the official writes, has been a "two-track presidency" in which Trump's own worldview -- uttered both in public and private -- diverges from some key actions taken by the administration, like those involving additional sanctions against Russia.
A dramatic alternative to the quiet effort to thwart some of Trump's more concerning actions was, however, considered, the official said: invoking the 25th Amendment.
The official alleges there were "early whispers within" Trump's Cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would require a majority of Cabinet officials to declare to Congress they believe the President is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office."
Explaining the "resistance" effort, the senior administration official offers a damning portrait of Trump's character and leadership ability.
The author argues the "root of the problem is the President's amorality" and assails Trump's "reckless decisions," "erratic behavior" and what the official describes as the President's "impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective" leadership style.
"The root of the problem is the President's amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making," the official writes. "Although he was elected as a Republican, the President shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people."
Trump officials react
The op-ed amplified the sense of paranoia inside the West Wing and resurrected the feeling that the White House is under assault from within, multiple sources told CNN.
Trump administration officials, struggling to mount a defense to Woodward's tell-all book, were stunned when the op-ed was published Wednesday afternoon, left guessing and quietly pointing fingers at other officials as they tried to figure out who wrote it, even texting reporters possible guesses.
Some echoed the sentiment voiced by White House press secretary Sarah Sanders that the official should resign.
"The individual behind this piece has chosen to deceive, rather than support, the duly elected President of the United States," she wrote in a statement. "He is not putting country first, but putting himself and his ego ahead of the will of the American people. This coward should do the right thing and resign."
Others called it as a bombshell -- noting how the author of the op-ed said multiple people in the administration felt the same way.
But the op-ed, compounded by Woodward's book sourced to numerous current and former White House officials, has left Trumpworld feeling under siege.
"I guess it's open warfare on Trump," one Trump ally said after the op-ed's publication.
The President started the day waging a witch hunt on who did -- and who didn't -- talk to Woodward. He was taking careful note of who had -- and hadn't -- issued statements of denial.
This witch hunt escalated dramatically -- and suddenly included the anonymous author of the New York Times essay, one administration official said, with the President intent on knowing who wrote the words he suggested could be treasonous.
A source close to the White House who's in touch with West Wing officials told CNN that aides are following leads based on the way the op-ed is written. The aides are looking at key words used in the editorial that stand out, the source said.
Extensive insights
JUST WATCHED Senior administration official hits Trump in op-ed Replay More Videos ... MUST WATCH Senior administration official hits Trump in op-ed 02:52
The senior administration official's op-ed offered extensive insights into the unvarnished thoughts of a top official, but the op-ed was in keeping with reports throughout Trump's presidency. In those reports, numerous senior administration officials have described Trump's impulsive decision-making and the chaos that has often animated the President's inner circle.
It's both a confirmation of the portrait of the President painted by Woodward and reporters covering the Trump administration as well as an attempt at reassurance.
"It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what's right even when Donald Trump won't," the official writes. "This isn't the work of the so-called deep state. It's the work of the steady state."
A Times spokeswoman said op-ed anonymity had been granted a handful of other times in the paper's history, most recently for a piece in June by an unnamed asylum seeker from El Salvador
In this case, The Times said it granted anonymity "at the request of the author" because the person's job "would be jeopardized by its disclosure."
The newspaper also pointed out that its opinion editors know the person's identity, so he or she is anonymous to the public, but not to the Times.
CNN's Kaitlan Collins, Jeff Zeleny, Jim Acosta and Brian Stelter contributed to this report.
This story has been updated.
President condemns ‘gutless’ source of piece revealing opposition within administration and claims paper must hand writer over
Donald Trump has called for the New York Times to reveal the identity of a senior administration official who the paper says is the author of a column revealing they are part of a “resistance” against the president’s “worst inclinations”.
The president vented his fury at the essay, which the newspaper said it had taken the rare step of running anonymously, saying the writer’s “identity is known to us” and their “job would be jeopardized by its disclosure”.
Its publication has prompted a frenzied search for the author.
Trump called for the source to be revealed in tweets on Wednesday evening, with one asking starkly: “TREASON?”
Trump aide's anonymous op-ed reveals 'resistance' inside administration Read more
Then in a follow up tweet, he insisted: “If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once.” Later he tweeted:
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) I’m draining the Swamp, and the Swamp is trying to fight back. Don’t worry, we will win!
Earlier a defiant Trump, appearing at an unrelated event at the White House, said of the New York Times: “They don't like Donald Trump and I don't like them.”
The essay immediately triggered a guessing game as to the author's identity on social media, in newsrooms and inside the White House, where officials were blindsided by its publication. The article’s language was being scrutinized for clues.
The writer, claiming to be part of the “resistance” to Trump – but not from the left – said: “Many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr Trump's more misguided impulses until he is out of office.”
The column went on: “It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room … We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what's right even when Donald Trump won't.”
Play Video 1:29 'Gutless': Trump responds to anonymous New York Times op-ed – video
Brian Stelter, senior media correspondent at CNN, reported that the author of the piece had used an intermediary several days ago to make contact with the New York Times op-ed editor Jim Dao.
Stelter said Dao had told him that there were only a "very small number of people within the Times who know this person's identity” and that a number of special precautions had been made to keep it protected. Dao would not elaborate.
The op-ed pages of the newspaper are managed separately from its news department.
Dao, Stelter reported, declined to comment on how senior the official was or reveal further nuances of the person’s role. It was unclear if the author worked in the White House or had direct contact with Trump.
The White House press secretary, Sarah Sanders, accused the author of choosing to “deceive” the president by remaining in the administration.
“He is not putting country first, but putting himself and his ego ahead of the will of the American people,” she said. “The coward should do the right thing and resign.”
Sanders also called on the New York Times to "issue an apology" for publishing the piece, calling it a "pathetic, reckless, and selfish op-ed".
White House officials did not immediately respond to a request to elaborate on Trump's call for the writer to be turned over to the government or the unsupported national security ground of his demand.
The furore over the op-ed comes after Trump had also hit out at a highly critical book on his presidency by the respected investigative journalist Bob Woodward. Trump called the book a “con of the public”.
Woodward, one of the journalists who helped uncover the Watergate scandal, portrays the Trump White House as chaotic and dysfunctional in his new book, Fear.
In one section, Woodward says that Trump ordered the defence secretary, James Mattis, to kill the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad after a chemical attack on civilians, but Mattis dismissed the order.
Speaking on Wednesday to Anderson Cooper on CNN, the former secretary of state, John Kerry, asked about the Woodward book and the New York Times op-ed, said there was a "genuine constitutional crisis" around the presidency.
The Associated Press contributed to this report
