Contact Form

 

Teams asking Canucks about Chris Tanev ahead of NHL Trade Deadline


While the big defensive fish being dangled ahead of the NHL’s 2018 trade deadline are offensive dynamos like Erik Karlsson and Mike Green, the Vancouver Canucks have seen interest continue to rise on one of their own rearguards as Feb. 26 draws near.

General managers around the league continue to inquire about Vancouver’s Chris Tanev, according to Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman, though it appears the Canucks aren’t keen on moving the 28-year-old for anything less than a significant return.

“He’s hurt right now, which could potentially complicate matters, but what I’ve been told is that the Canucks have told teams — including, I believe, Toronto — ‘If you’re serious, it’s going to take a special offer to do this,’” Friedman said during the Headlines segment of Hockey Night in Canada on Saturday.

“I think the Canucks realize still that even though they are rebuilding, you want to give your young players a chance. And you’ve got to be serious, really serious, if you want to get Tanev out [of Vancouver].”

After finishing with the second-worst record in the league last season, the Canucks have enjoyed a modest revival of sorts in 2017-18. While team-wide success continues to elude them, Vancouver has seen rookie Brock Boeser emerge as one of the most promising goal-scorers in the game, positioning himself as a Calder Trophy favourite with 27 tallies to his name thus far.

Tanev has followed suit with a modest improvement of his own, posting 11 points through 38 games this season after putting up 10 points through 53 games in 2016-17. Though that sum isn’t putting Tanev in the running for a Norris Trophy, it is enough to match the best points-per-game pace of the eight-year veteran’s career.

The long-time Canuck has two more seasons left on his five-year deal, carrying a cap hit of $4.45 million and a modified no-trade clause, according to CapFriendly.


VANCOUVER – On the night the Vancouver Canucks celebrated Chinese New Year – the year of the dog – they beat the Boston Bruins 6-1.

Probably just a coincidence. Still, gung hay fat choy.

Rogers Arena was all dragons and drums Saturday night. And that was just the Canucks, who scored four times in the first period to easily beat the Bruins and create the happiest night of the National Hockey League season in Vancouver. And the best part? Chinese New Year lasts another week – almost until next Monday’s trade deadline.

Actually, the best part was that Canucks defenceman Erik Gudbranson launched into the boards Bruins’ Brad Marchand, the low-bridger of Sami Salo, speed-bagger of Daniel Sedin, lifter of the Stanley Cup on this ice nearly seven years ago. Year of the dog, not night of the rat.

General manager Jim Benning confirmed on Hockey Night in Canada that he is still in contract discussions with Gudbranson, who is eligible for unrestricted free agency this summer and, thus, will be re-signed or traded by the Canucks before the Feb. 26 deadline.

We’re not sure Gudbranson is worth the $4-5-million salary he will command on his next contract, but we do know Benning has a far better chance to sell that deal in Vancouver after Gudbranson’s hit. He can play 18 minutes a night in a defensive role, as long as he smokes Brad Marchand once a year in Vancouver.

“I didn’t really even hit him,” Gudbranson said. “He was a little off-balance and I just kind of clipped him. If I’d really tried to hit him, I’d have been suspended for five games because he had his head down, facing the boards.”

Yes, so?

Do unto Marchand as the rat would do unto you?

Well, perhaps not. Regardless of for whom Gudbranson is playing next week, the Canucks need him in the lineup this week. The Colorado Avalanche visit on Tuesday.

“I’m not going to say I hated him, but I wasn’t a fan of him,” Canucks defenceman Troy Stecher said of Marchand, whom he remembers from the 2011 final when Stecher was cheering for the Canucks like everyone else who grew up in Metro Vancouver. “You come out for warmup and you can already feel the buzz and the atmosphere. I think it’s always going to be that way when the Bruins come here. It was a great first period and we just kind of rode the wave after that.”

The Bruins, who were 20-2-4 since Dec. 14, were lit up after travelling across the continent on Friday, then practising. Bruins coach Bruce Cassidy also ordered up a full morning skate on Saturday. The Boston player who looked most tired was goalie Tuukka Rask, who allowed the four first-period goals on just eight shots as Vancouver built its 4-0 lead despite being outshot 18-8.

The game was only two minutes old when former Bruin Loui Eriksson made it 1-0, converting Daniel Sedin’s goalmouth pass by sliding the puck under Rask’s arm. Thomas Vanek’s terrific pass left Sedin with a semi-open net that he deftly hit from a sharp angle to double the lead at 10:54. And just 56 seconds later, Canucks centre Bo Horvat embarrassed rookie defenceman Charlie McAvoy and roofed a shot on Rask to make it 3-0.

The fourth goal said everything you needed to know about the first period. Rask made a good pad save on Sven Baertschi on a 3-on-2. Horvat overskated the sharp rebound, but the puck was cleared by a Bruin off Canucks winger Brock Boeser and bounced into the net at 18:39.

Yes, it would be nice if the Canucks could ration their fortunate bounces for a game when they’re needed. But after a pile of bleak winter nights at Rogers Arena, no one in the festive sellout crowd of 18,865 was complaining.

Nic Dowd’s rebound goal after a terrific, power move to the net by Jake Virtanen made it 5-0 at 2:44 of the second and Eriksson, who was pointless in his previous seven games, scored his second of the night shorthanded in the third period.

Tim Schaller, at 2:57 of the third, was the only Bruin to get a puck past Canucks goalie Anders Nilsson, who got the chance to start due to Jacob Markstrom’s flu or cold and delivered his first victory in nine starts since Nov. 30.

Nilsson finished with 44 saves and enjoyed more goal support in one night than the Canucks had given him in his last five starts.

“It feels great to be able to contribute to two points,” Nilsson said. “We have to be honest: we had some bounces on our side. I think they had three shots (off the post) in the first period, so the puck was definitely bouncing our way tonight. It’s nice to have that on our side.

“It’s always nice to stand back there and see the guys play a really good game in front of you. It’s also nice to stand back there and see them score some goals.”

Added Canucks captain Henrik Sedin: “Before the game you look up and see how many people were here. I told someone on the bench, ‘It’s been a while since we had this buzz in the building.’ I think all the guys enjoyed it tonight. It was an atmosphere that was the best in a long time. It was fun.”

Hopefully the start of a new year for the Canucks.


When couples visit a marriage counsellor, the first problem they cite in their relationship invariably concerns communication.

You never listen to me, they’ll say, or you misconstrue my meaning or take it out of context. They’ll also say your message might be clear to you but it’s not clear to me. And they’ll complain their partner doesn’t take the time to fully explain themselves, leaving the other person to guess at what they’re trying to say.

As it happens, this communication problem seems to exist in the most complicated relationship in this province — the one between the Vancouver Canucks and their fan base. A couple of days ago, in a development that should have qualified as good news, the Canucks announced a contract extension for general manager Jim Benning. Unfortunately, it didn’t play out that way because, in the ensuing press conference, a large portion of the Canucks’ congregation was either confused or conflicted as Benning and Linden laid out their vision for the team.

They’re not committed to youth, was a popular refrain. They’re going to try to sign more free agents, was another. Perhaps the most damning was the Canucks’ management team appeared satisfied with the status quo.

This, moreover, isn’t the first time the Canucks have had a problem sending the appropriate message, leaving a large segment of the faithful in the role of the aggrieved partner. I know you think I know what you’re saying but I don’t. How can I trust you when I don’t trust what you’re saying?

In a quiet moment in San Jose, Benning was asked about this; asked if he understands the confusion Canucks fans sometimes feel about the management team’s message.

Let’s see if this helps.

“I always look at it as there are three different parts of getting to where we want to be,” he said. “One is drafting good players. The second is developing them. And the third is when they’re ready to play, play them with players who suit their game so they can be the best players they can be.

“That’s the plan. That’s the way we’re looking at things. I don’t think what we said (at Wednesday’s press conference) contradicts that.”

Maybe not, and maybe the master plan will be revealed at this trade deadline and in the offseason. But, until then, the faithful wait and wonder as they stare down another finish in the NHL’s dungeon.

Benning, of course, is under enormous pressure to accelerate the rebuild, and with the best group of prospects in franchise history now on their way, the future becomes the dominant theme in the Canucks’ life story.

The GM sees things the same way. Where he might differ with his many unpaid assistants is how his team gets there, but he says it’s all clear to him.

“We’ve got a lot of good young players who are going to turn pro this summer,” he said. “Some of them are going to make the team. If they do, we’ll find spots for them like we did with Brock (Boeser). Others are going to need development time.

One is drafting good players. The second is developing them. And the third is when they’re ready to play, play them with players who suit their game …

“But I don’t think there’s a case where we’ve had a young player who’s ready to play in the NHL and we’ve kept him out of the league. I don’t see that part of it.”

Benning continued.

“If Adam Gaudette shows up and proves he’s ready to play in the NHL, then we’ll make a spot for him. Same with Elias (Pettersson). We want to get younger and faster. That’s the way the league is going. But it’s not as easy as drafting them and having them show up the next year or the year after.”

OK, that seems pretty clear. But Benning made one point at his presser which caused a great deal of angst in the Canucks’ fan base. Addressing the topic of team building, he talked about exploring free agency to bring in veterans to “support” the team’s younger players.

To many Canucks supporters, that meant, at worst, another Loui Eriksson signing or, at best, more in the Thomas Vanek-Michael Del Zotto-Sam Gagner vein. We’d like to tell you Benning backed off that point. But he did elaborate on it.

“We want veteran players to support young players so we can create an environment like San Jose has,” Benning said. “They have the Thorntons, Pavelskis and Coutures to help the next group along. We’re trying to get a group of guys who can shoulder the burden, then put them with young guys.

“We have lots of question marks before we start to figure out what happens in free agency. But our job is to support the (young players) so we don’t throw them to the wolves.”

How they assemble that group is the next question, and that’s where things get problematic. The plain fact is the Canucks’ existing veterans aren’t good enough to lead on a consistent basis and assembling a new leadership group on the fly is next to impossible. Sure, they can keep the Sedins around for another season to act as the resident locker room Yodas. Beyond that, the onus is on Bo Horvat, Boeser and maybe a Chris Tanev to drive this team forward while the younger players find their way.

The other possibility is, maybe, the kids are ready to step into feature roles on the NHL team, that Gaudette, Pettersson and Olli Juolevi are sufficiently evolved to assume a larger responsibility.

“That’s the best-case scenario, that these guys come in and they’re ready to play,” Benning said. “If they are, we’ll find a spot for them.”

At least that part seems clear enough.

ewilles@postmedia.com

twitter.com/willesonsports


It’s always better when the Vancouver Canucks beat the Boston Bruins.

It will always mean more than most games in Vancouver.

The Canucks looked deep and dangerous, on their way to a 6-1 win, Saturday night at Rogers Arena.

Here’s what we learned …

THE CANUCKS WERE AMPED TO PLAY THE BRUINS

They had speed. Boy, did they have speed.

They had skill. They made plays. The youngest players romped. They crashed the net.

The oldest players were everything you’d hope the Sedins could be at 37 years old.

They zeroed in on Brad Marchand, hitting and aggravating him.

It was just one game. But what a glorious game it was for the city of Vancouver.

There haven’t been a lot of really fun nights at Rogers Arena this season. This made up for a lot of that.

GREEN GOT RESULTS FROM BENCHING BAERTSCHI

It was the healthy scratch heard around the Lower Mainland.

Just days after GM Jim Benning’s extension, the player he acquired in a trade held up as one of his best was scratched.

It’s not the first time Sven Baertschi has been healthy and had to sit out. It happened under Willie Desjardins, and he responded with one of his best runs as a Canuck.

On Saturday, the entire team responded.

You can start with Baertschi, who had pop and scored a goal too, creating chaos when he charged the net with linemates Bo Horvat and Brock Boeser.

THE TRADE DEADLINE GUYS CAME UP BIG

Erik Gudbranson always seems to be at his most physical when the most eyes are on him.

He’s had some big Saturday nights, and this was among them. He crushed Marchand into the sideboards like he was squashing a fruit fly.

He didn’t stop there. He pancaked David Pastrnak with the force of a small truck and then also broke up a near-breakaway by catching up to the play and smothering the guy.

Did he have some lapses along the way?

Sure. He got walked by Pastrnak on a play.

But who cares? Did you see this guy hit?

This was exactly the the type of game the Canucks needed to sell high on him. Now, someone has to convince Benning that’s the way to go.

Like Gudbranson, Thomas Vanek is on an expiring contract and is expected to be moved by the deadline. He had a great primary assist, setting up Daniel Sedin by cutting through the slot and making a nice cross-ice pass for a tap-in.

THE CANUCKS CAN PLAY FAST

This is a totally different team when Bo Horvat and Jake Virtanen are exploiting defencemen with their speed.

Horvat flew around Charlie McAvoy, who is one of the best young defencemen in the NHL. He used his speed to get in on net and chip the puck by Tuukka Rask.

Jake Virtanen’s play was more mesmerizing. The play started innocently enough, Virtanen carrying the puck on the left side, with the Bruins’ defence in perfect position to defend him.

But as Virtanen glided over the Boston blueline, it was like he flipped the nitrous tank. He didn’t have angle. He just had sheer speed. He smoked by Torey Krug, who’s a very skilled blueliner, and cut over top of Rask, before Nic Dowd smacked in the rebound.

Now that play was Virtanen at his best, and so was this game.

He hit. He was engaged. He had three shots on net. He was everything you’d hope he’d be 6-7 times out of 10. For most of the season, however, it’s been closer to 2-3 times out 10.

BENNING AFTER A POWER FORWARD

In an intermission interview on Hockey Night in Canada, Benning revealed the type of player he’ll be chasing.

Many are hoping the Canucks will hunt draft picks and prospects before the deadline, but Benning threw this tremendous curveball:

“If we’re looking for a need here at the trade deadline,” Benning told the Sportsnet panel, “we’d like to add a big player.

“Maybe a forward with some physicality who has the skill to make plays.”

Well, this doesn’t sound encouraging.

ANDERS NILSSON WAS REALLY GOOD

Finally getting some playing time, Nilsson looked like the goalie who ended October with a .943 save percentage.

Anders Nilsson had started only eight times since the beginning of December before this game but got the tap when Jacob Markstrom was too ill to play.

It was his second start in a row, and he made 44 saves in one of the better performances by a Canucks goalie this season.

None of it was easy as the Bruins had a lot of high-danger chances.

LOUI ERIKSSON SHOWED UP

Somewhere inside him exists the player who scored 30 goals two seasons ago. We haven’t seen much of it in Vancouver, but we got a glimpse Saturday as he scored a couple of garbage goals.

It’s plays like those that got him paid.

jbotchford@postmedia.com

twitter.com/botchford

Total comment

Author

fw

0   comments

Cancel Reply